The Fallacy of Composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. Conversely, the Fallacy of Division occurs when one infers that something true for the whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. Both fallacies were described by Aristotle in Sophistical Refutations.
Fallacy of composition
The logical form of the Fallacy of Composition is:
Premise 1: A is part of B
Premise 2: A has property X
Conclusion: Therefore, B has property X.
Two examples of this fallacy are:
If someone stands up out of his seat at a baseball game, he can see better. Therefore, if everyone stands up they can all see better.
If a runner runs faster, she can win the race. Therefore if all the…
View original post 306 more words