That’s the question I tackled in a recent essay at The Philosophers’ Magazine online, prompted by a conversation over coffee with Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at NYU with whom I’ve had a number of disagreements about the intersection of social science, politics, and philosophy.
View original post 727 more words
Filed under Uncategorized
 | Tim Harding on ‘It’s only a theory’ |
 | Paul Harrison on ‘It’s only a theory’ |
| Tim Harding on ‘It’s only a theory’ |
| Paul Harrison on ‘It’s only a theory’ |
 | SoundEagle 🦅ೋღஜஇ on A Different Take on E.O. … |
Art of Living (ethics), Good Reasoning (philosophy), How the World Works (science). Philosophia longa, vita brevis!
A modern symposium for the digital age
Posts on the History of Law, Crime, and Justice
Louis Armstrong House Museum Virtual Exhibits
Just another WordPress.com site
A window into Doc Freiberger's library
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
On Books, Reading and other Delightful Things
Friends of Science in Medicine
Public health, memoirs, music
History, Reviews, Archives.
Author, Elizabeth Macarthur
Tim Harding's writings on rationality, informal logic and skepticism
Defending Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
reflections on books and art
Fighting pseudoscience and quackery with reason and evidence.
Skeptical musings on the denial of evidence
The Logical Place 
I support academics commenting on political issues as a form of public education, but stopping short of endorsing a particular party or candidate so as to retain an appearance of independence and objectivity.
LikeLike