by Matthew Cobb
All tetrapods have kneecaps, although it appears that they evolved more than once. Even tuatara have kneecaps (it was long thought they did not). And here’s a kneet biomechanics demonstration of why they are so useful, and what you can and can’t do without them.
Kicking myself for not thinking of demonstrating this biomechanical principle this way myself. https://t.co/bAta34O4n4—
Paul Ingraham (@PainSci) February 24, 2016
Filed under Reblogs
 | Jose on Gravitational waves discovered… |
 | Tim Harding on Skepticism, Science and S… |
 | Urban on Reflections on the skeptic and… |
| Tim Harding on The Rejection of Expertis… |
 | Jarod Settimo on Hobbes’ laws of nat… |
Fighting pseudoscience and quackery with reason and evidence.
Skeptical musings on the denial of evidence
A sharp-eyed view of questionable claims
Philosophy, ethics, metaethics.
Philosophical adventures in a complex world
Journalism from London.
Turning an eye on the profession, separating fact from fiction on both sides of the counter
The Independent Woman and the myth of the Australian bushman
The Secular Party of Australia stands for separation between church and state.
A madman's reflections on religion, philosophy, history, politics, and wherever else the path to truth leads
Philosophy, Danny Krämer
~ Doubt and About ~
Silly trivia questions - I already know the answers, so send witty or sarcastic replies!
because all (Western) philosophy consists of a series of footnotes to Plato
Australian jazz, and other ramblings
Tim Harding's writings on rationality, informal logic and skepticism
Tim Harding's writings on rationality, informal logic and skepticism
Evolutionary theory is normally taken to apply only to living things.
LikeLike
And, why would energy efficiency guide what is ‘naturally’ selected? Was the moon selected to orbit the earth, or the oort cloud selected in some natural manner related to life ?
LikeLike
..or i mean the relarionship of development that thus then would link life and nonlife?
LikeLike
I was undergraduate educated in evilutionary thoery, but i was thinking about it again with your posts.
What do you think and or do you know: is ev thoery only concering life, and life in this planet? Does its principles. Or can they be extended to explain and include non living things, like planets and supernovas, as well life and non life?
LikeLike