Physicist Prof. Richard Feynman explains the scientific and unscientific methods of understanding nature.
Physicist Prof. Richard Feynman explains the scientific and unscientific methods of understanding nature.
Filed under Videos
Ethics, Logic, and Science for Living in Accordance with Nature
Posts on the History of Law, Crime, and Justice
Louis Armstrong House Museum Virtual Exhibits
Just another WordPress.com site
A window into Doc Freiberger's library
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
On Books, Reading and other Delightful Things
Friends of Science in Medicine
Public health, memoirs, music
History, Reviews, Archives.
Author, Elizabeth Macarthur
Tim Harding's writings on rationality, informal logic and skepticism
Defending Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Reflections on books and art
Fighting pseudoscience and quackery with reason and evidence.
Skeptical musings on the denial of evidence
The philosophy of science in the US was so dominated by the “logical empiricism” that was carried from Europe by the intellectual diaspora of the 1930s that Popper would have only been mentioned in passing in intellectual circles, (if at all) as a “positivist with a twist”.
It is unlikely that they would have said anything about Popper that would arouse interest in a scientist who was quite contemptuous of philosophy, with good reasons in the case of the logical positivists and the logical empiricists!
LikeLike
Feynman never mentioned Popper but he was a Popperian without knowing it – the driving principle was to “guess and test”!
Strange that nobody ever told him about Popper.
LikeLike
I agree that Feynman was a Popperian on scientific method, but I would be surprised if he was unfamiliar with Popper’s work, even if only second-hand. Although physics professors may not read much philosophy, the academic circles that Feynman moved in at that time (1950s and 60s) would probably have mentioned Popper from time to time when discussing scientific methods. Of course, this was a popular talk rather than an academic lecture, so citation of references would not normally be done in this context.
LikeLike