The Appeal to Nature Fallacy

by Tim Harding

How often do we see the word ‘natural’ on product labels ranging from breakfast cereals to cosmetics?  It has become one of the most common consumer ‘hooks’ used in marketing today.  ‘Natural’ is also a keyword in many herbal remedies and other alternatives to medicine that skeptics are skeptical about.

The logical fallacy known as ‘Appeal to Nature’ usually takes the following form of argument:

  Premise: N is natural.

  Conclusion: Therefore, N is good, safe or right.


  Premise: U is unnatural.

  Conclusion: Therefore, U is bad, unsafe or wrong.

Like all logical fallacies, these arguments are invalid because the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises.  In other words, the premises can be true but the conclusion can be false.

For instance, there are hundreds of naturally occurring plants, fungi and animals that are poisonous – not to mention naturally venomous spiders, snakes and jellyfish.  Even some parts of common ‘natural’ foods can be toxic in small doses.  These include green potatoes; the seeds of apples, cherries, apricots, peaches and plums; and the leaves of rhubarb and tomatoes.  There are few reported deaths as a result of eating these foods; but we have all heard of deaths from eating poisonous naturally occurring mushrooms and Fugu fish. There have also been deaths from drinking ‘natural’ raw milk. Recent research has demonstrated risks of neurodegenerative illness from the ‘natural’ dietary supplement Spirulina.

The Appeal to Nature Fallacy is probably behind much of the opposition to genetically modified foods, despite the fact that humans have been genetically modifying food species by breeding for over 11,000 years since the dawn of civilisation.  More extreme forms of this fallacy can manifest themselves as Chemophobia – fear of chemicals, Pharmacophobia – fear of medicines and Technophobia – fear of new technologies.  Such phobias are thought to stem from incomplete knowledge of science, or a misunderstanding of science, or a general fear of the unknown.

If you find the information on this blog useful, you might like to consider supporting us.

Make a Donation Button


Filed under Logical fallacies

7 responses to “The Appeal to Nature Fallacy

  1. Tom Arniel

    The human body absorbs and utilizes most vitamins and minerals more efficiently and effectively than synthetic ones as does the soil and plants on the planet, so while you make an interesting point I will go natural whenever possible.


  2. @theage: Almost half of ‘natural’ products are considered unhealthy


  3. Pingback: Try this, it’s natural! | Lars-Henrik Bergström

  4. Sorry, but I don’t quite understand your meaning. Would you care to elaborate?


  5. Esperons que vous en avez d autre de ce niveau pour nous! (Hope you have sides of this level for us!)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s